Yes, "by" is used to mean, no later than 8. They might arrive a bit earlier.
from: https://hinative.com/en-US/questions/15405462
from: https://hinative.com/en-US/questions/15405462
from: https://hinative.com/zh-TW/questions/599496
一、詞性上面的區別:
fast既是形容詞,也是副詞。quick是形容詞,它的副詞形式是quickly。
二、fast和quick,quickly都翻譯成「快速」,但是它們強調的地方是完全不一樣的。
1)fast表示物體的運動速度很快,強調的是「速度」。比如:一輛汽車在快速行駛;一個人在快速奔跑。在此時,我們不能使用quick來表達。
例如:It is a fast train. 它是一輛速度很快的火車。(強調的是「速度快」)
You walk very fast. 你走的很快。 (強調的是「速度快」)
She loves fast cars. 她喜歡時速很快的車。(強調的是「速度快」)
(Not: She loves quick cars. )
2)quick,quickly表示動作需要在很短的時間內,甚至是比計劃時間更短的時間內,快速完成。也就是說,quick強調的是「時間」,因為時間來不及了,所以動作要以「比正常快的速度」來完成(有一種被催促的感覺在裡面)。
例如:We need to have a quick chat before themeeting . 在開會之前,我們需要抓
緊時間聊一下。(強調的是「時間緊迫」)
We just need a quick answer . (強調的是「短時間內給出回答」)
(Not: We just need a fast answer.)
We should do it as quickly as possible. (強調的是以「儘可能短的時間」快
速完成。)
When someone asks you “What do you do?“, they’re asking about your job. In English, people don’t actually say “What is your job?“. Instead they say “What do you do?“ and the correct response is “I’m a/an + a job title”.
Examples:
“What is your job?“ is still used in English textbooks, but in real life native English speakers almost never say that. They will mostly say:
from: https://learnenglishwithdemi.wordpress.com/2016/01/02/what-do-you-do-or-what-is-your-job/
Ever means 'at any time'.
So,
“Have you seen?” is said when you are asking someone if they have seen a particular person or thing in a specified short period of time maybe this hour or this day.
While, “have you ever seen?” is spoken when you are asking someone if they have seen a particular person or thing at any time maybe even once in their whole life.
For example:
• Have you seen Claire? I thought she was waiting for me at the bus stop.
• Have you ever seen a flying UFO? I thought they only exist in fiction.
• Have you seen my dog? I am looking for him for the past hour!
• Have you ever seen my dog? He's really cute!
from: https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/502746/whats-the-difference-between-have-you-seen-and-have-you-ever-seen
“It seems to be” is correct. This is immediately clear if you consider what “It’s” means in the other choice. “It’s” is a contraction of “It is”. Using this in the first sentence would result in “It is seems to be” which is obviously incorrect. So the correct sentence is, “It seems to be”.
It seems that it depends on context. If we are around with the ability to point on the object, meaning that we see it, then we can use "this" or "that" depends on the distance. But if we don't see it at all, we use "it".
It depends on where home is relative to where you are speaking.
If you are at home when you say this, you normally use "I came home" but if you are not at home, you say "I went home".“to be used to” is much more common
I'd prefer 'Do you...?' instead of 'Can you...?'. It just sounds more polite.
A:在英文中,有幾種句型可以表示禮貌性請求。在此我們將討論最常見的以 “I” 和以 “you” 作主詞的禮貌性請求。首先來看以 I 當主詞的禮貌性請求,如 Could I borrow your pen (please)?;May I (please) borrow your pen? (注意:please 可以放在句末或主詞後面)。這兩句都意為「我可以借你的筆嗎?」,而且禮貌程度等量齊觀、不相上下。不過,要注意的是,在禮貌性請求中,could 係表示現在或未來的意義,並非過去的意義。此外,我們亦可使用 Can I borrow your pen?,但 Can I 係用於非正式場合,尤其是用在說話者對他或她相當熟識的人提出請求的場合。一般通常認為 Can I 的禮貌程度略低於 Could I 或 May I。事實上,Might I 也可以表示禮貌性請求,如 Might I borrow your pen?,但 Might I 係用於非常正式且講究禮貌的場合,所以它的使用頻率比 Could I 或 May I 低很多。
對於以 I 當主詞的禮貌性請求,一般典型的回應是 “Certainly”、”Yes, certainly”、”Of course”、”Yes, of course” 或 “Sure” (非正式)。吾人亦經常使用動作來回應禮貌性請求,如點頭、搖頭或只是「嗯」(uh-huh) 一聲。
What's the difference between near and nearby?
This is a great question. It's also a hard one to answer in brief terms, but I’ll do my best!
Near and nearby are both synonyms for close. However, there are three clear and important differences in their meaning and use:
1) The first difference is that near is often used as a preposition, but nearby can never be properly used as a preposition. Furthermore, when near is a preposition, it doesn’t simply mean close, it means close to, as shown in this example:
2) The second difference is that near can mean close in time (=soon), as well as close in distance, but nearby cannot, as shown below:
3) The third difference is that nearby can appear either before or after a noun that it describes, but near can normally appear only before the noun, and even then, only when referring to time.* Here are some examples:
*There is one exception to this near + noun restriction: It’s perfectly acceptable to use near + noun when referring to distance in a sentence that contrasts near with far, as in this example:
- The near side of the garage needs a paint job, but the far side looks okay.
1 `everyone' and `everybody'
在表示「開始」的意思時,begin 和 start 為同義詞,可當及物或不及物動詞用,且兩者皆可後接不定詞和動名詞,但 begin 比 start 來得正式。Begin 是個不規則動詞,過去式和過去分詞分別為 began 和 begun。例如:
Start 亦有「創辦,開辦;(企業或其他機構) 開業,開始營運」的意思 (與 start up 同義),但 begin 則無這樣的意思。例如:
Start 還有另一項意思也是 begin 所沒有的,那就是「(機器) 開動,啟動」。例如:
這句話如果依照中文思考,我們會很單純覺得是「你想要什麼?」,但是在英語母語人士聽起來可不是這樣喔,在不對的情境下或用不對的語氣說出這句話可能會大大冒犯別人。
What do you want?
你以為是:「你想要什麼?」
其實是:「你到底想怎樣!」、「你想怎樣啦!」、「你想幹嘛?」
如果在不適當的時機說出這句話,語氣又拿捏錯誤,對方聽到可能會想說:「是要跟我吵架嗎?」下一秒立刻變臉喔!
這句話在英文中不是不能用,而是使用的時機通常都是在和他人吵架,或是不耐煩、生氣的時候。比如說路上有一個不認識的人一直跟著你、跟你說話,你可以生氣地轉過去跟他說:
What do you want?(你到底想幹嘛?)
或著你很忙碌地在工作,但前男友一直打電話來煩你,你可能會說:
He’s calling again. What does he want?(他又打來了。他到底想怎樣?)
What do you want from me?(你到底想要我怎樣?)
回到情境對話,Amy 遇到客人時,想要問「您需要什麼?」、「您想要什麼嗎?」的情境下就不能使用 What do you want?,而要改成:
Do you need anything?(您需要什麼嗎?)
How can I help you?(我該怎麼協助您呢?)
What can I do for you?(能為您做些什麼呢?)
Would you like some help?(需要協助嗎?)
Can I help you with anything?(能為你做些什麼嗎?)
如果你的職業是客服人員或服務業的門市人員,就特別需要謹慎運用正確的說法。如果不是在和他人吵架,就不要輕易用出 What do you want? 喔!
I don’t know none of them.我不认识他们中的任何一个。
I don’t know any of them.我不认识他们中的任何一个。
I know none of them.我一个都不认识。
I know any of them.我认识他们中的任何一个。
最近講過如何用 (wish + subject + past subjunctive) 這種句子結構去表達「對現狀的遺憾」(present regrets):
"To want something to happen or to be true even though it is unlikely or impossible."
「希望不大可能的事發生;懷著不可能實現的願望。」
"To want something to happen and think that it is possible."
1.Over my dead body. - 休想
2.No way!- 沒門兒!
3.Not a chance!- 休想!
4.Dream on. - 做夢吧。
5.Don't even think about it. - 想都別想。
I have long hair. - If you mean that all your hair is long
I have a long hair - If you mean that just one of your hairs is (unusually) long, longer than all of the others (which would be an odd situation, but not inconceivable)
(1) I have the final say.
(2) I have the final word.
(3) I make the final decision.
I have the final decision.
(4) I am the one who makes final decision.
(5) I am the boss.
(6) I am the person in charge.
當 lack 作為一個動詞時,架構是 lack + 缺乏的東西
1. He lacks practical experience.
2. Some students lack confidence when they speak in English.
3. She has the determination that her brother lacks.
當 lack 作為一個名詞時,架構則是:
lack of 缺乏的東西
1. He shows a lack of practical experience.
2. Some students show a lack of confidence when they speak in public.
3. The trip was canceled due to a lack of interest.
lack 的形容詞形式是 lacking,架構是:
lacking (in 缺乏的東西)
1. He is lacking in practical experience.
2. Some students are lacking in confidence when they speak in English.
3. The book is completely lacking in originality.
4. He was hired as a teacher but was found lacking
smile emoticon
was thought not to be good enough).
5. I feel there is something lacking.* I’m not sure what it is, but I just feel that something missing in my life.
It depends on the time frame.
Too is used for emphasis also, but it means ‘more than needed’ or ‘more than enough.’ It is used to show that something is bad (negative) or that something is over the desired limit. Take a look at these ideas:
The second sentence means that he is very tall and that is a bad thing. His height is over the limit. He is 2 meters tall. Therefore he cannot fit on an airplane. John is too tall.
Let’s look at more examples.
Again, the second sentence is a negative comment. You are saying that the person works more than enough and should work less.
Because too describes something bad (negative), the below sentences do not make sense.
These sentences all describe good (positive) things, so we do not use too.
Note: Too is often used in the structure too + adjective/adverb + infinitive
Yes, "by" is used to mean, no later than 8. They might arrive a bit earlier. from: https://hinative.com/en-US/questions/15405462